The Attempted Trump Assassination AR-15 Rifle Build: Analyzing the Choices

*Information is in constant flux as the investigation proceeds, so we’ll do our best to keep this information updated as we get more updates.

In a shocking turn of events, the recent attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump by 20-year-old Thomas Crooks has brought the AR-15, a popular but controversial rifle, back into the spotlight.

This incident has sparked numerous discussions about the firearm, its capabilities, and its accessibility. The rifle in question, manufactured by DPMS Panther Arms, has several noteworthy aspects that shed light on both the event and the firearm’s role.

Trump Shooter Rifle Specs

DPMS Panther Arms: A Budget-Tier AR-15

DPMS Panther Arms is known for producing budget-tier AR-15 rifles. These rifles are often considered lower-tier within the firearms industry due to their more affordable pricing and sometimes inconsistent quality. This inconsistency can manifest in various ways, including the build quality and materials used in the rifle’s construction.

The accuracy of the DPMS AR-15, like many budget-tier rifles, can vary. Typically, these rifles can achieve a Minute of Angle (MOA) of around 2 to 3 inches at 100 yards. MOA is a standard measurement used to describe the accuracy of a firearm, and in this case, it means that at 100 yards, the rifle can reliably hit within a 2 to 3-inch circle of the point of aim. This level of accuracy is acceptable for many applications but is less precise than higher-end rifles that can achieve sub-MOA performance.

The Unmagnified Red Dot Optic | Holosun AEMS

In addition to the rifle itself, Thomas Crooks was using an unmagnified optic during the attempted assassination. While the exact make and model of the optic have not been confirmed, it is believed to be similar to the Holosun AEMS Red Dot. Known for its advanced technology and durability, the Holosun AEMS Red Dot optic offers users unparalleled clarity and precision.

Features like Shake Awake technology and a multi-reticle system provide quick target acquisition, making it a favorite among AR-15 enthusiasts. Its compact design and robust construction ensure reliability in various conditions, enhancing performance and user confidence. You can find more details about this optic on Holosun’s official website.

Red dot optics, without magnification, are generally used for close to mid-range engagements. They provide a clear aiming point and are easier to use under stress than traditional iron sights. However, their lack of magnification can make precise long-distance shots more challenging, especially for an inexperienced shooter.

Magpul Collapsible Stock

Magpul is a well-respected name in the firearm accessory market, known for producing durable and reliable parts. This build included a Magpul CTR Carbine stock, a popular choice for its balance of quality and affordability.

Priced around $50-$60, the CTR stock is a reasonable option for those seeking reliability without breaking the bank. Unfortunately, this particular stock seemed to have been altered or damaged, possibly due to an attempt to reduce weight or for aesthetic purposes, which may have compromised its integrity.

Aero Precision Upper

Aero Precision’s components are generally considered a step up from the basic budget options, offering solid performance at a reasonable price. The shooter opted for an Aero R1 handguard, a product known for being a good value.

It’s speculated that the upper, including the barrel and handguard, was bought as a complete unit for around $400. This choice would have provided a sturdy yet cost-effective option for someone not overly concerned with top-tier performance but looking for something reliable.

The Final Build Cost

When considering the shooter’s goal—taking a precision shot at a significant distance—it’s evident that the build was not optimal. The use of a non-magnified optic, paired with lower-end components, suggests a lack of preparation or understanding of the necessary equipment for such a task. A more suitable setup might have included a magnified optic, such as a Leupold, which would provide a clearer sight picture and increase the likelihood of hitting the intended target accurately.

Estimating the total cost of the rifle, including all parts and accessories, suggests that the shooter invested between $1,100 and $1,300. While this might seem substantial, it’s modest for a fully outfitted AR-15. For comparison, high-end builds can easily exceed $3,000, offering superior performance and reliability. The choice of budget components in this case likely reflects both the shooter’s financial limitations and a lack of advanced firearm knowledge.

The Ammunition: Speculations and Considerations

Another critical aspect of this event is the ammunition used. Although the exact type of ammo has not been released, it is safe to assume that it was standard 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington rounds. These calibers are common for AR-15 rifles and offer a range of bullet weights, typically between 55-grain to 77-grain Hollow Point Boat Tail (HPBT) rounds.

The choice of ammunition can significantly impact the performance of the rifle. Heavier bullets, such as the 77-grain HPBT, are often more accurate at longer distances due to their better ballistic coefficient, which helps them maintain velocity and resist wind drift. Conversely, lighter bullets like the 55-grain rounds are generally more common and less expensive but may not offer the same level of precision at extended ranges.

The Shooting: A Challenging 150-Yard Shot

The distance of the shot, approximately 150 yards, presents a moderate challenge, especially for an untrained shooter. While an AR-15 can be effective at this range, hitting a target the size of a human head requires skill and practice. According to the investigation, Thomas Crooks had visited a local range a few days before the incident. Whether he practiced or zeroed his rifle remains unknown, but this preparation likely played a role in his attempt.

The maximum effective range of an AR-15 is the furthest distance at which a target can be hit accurately. It’s generally between 500 and 600 yards for a standard AR-15 with a 16–20 inch barrel and chambered in 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington. However, factors like the shooter’s skill, optics, and ammo can affect the range.

Additionally, Crooks utilized a laser range finder to determine the exact distance to his target. This tool would have given him a precise measurement, increasing his chances of hitting his intended target. However, the combination of an unmagnified optic, a budget-tier rifle, and his lack of formal training would have made the shot difficult. This difficulty is likely why Crooks fired several shots rapidly, hoping to increase his chances of success.

The Outcome and Implications

Despite the challenges, the AR-15 in Thomas Crooks’s hands proved to be a significant threat. The incident underscores the capabilities of even budget-tier AR-15s when used with intent. It also highlights the importance of understanding the various components and accessories that can influence the performance of such firearms.

This event has reignited debates about firearm regulations, the accessibility of AR-15 rifles, and the measures needed to prevent such incidents in the future. As the investigation continues, more details will likely emerge, providing further insights into the factors that led to this near-tragic event.

RELATED – AFFORDABLE TRUCK GUN BUILD UNDER $900

Addressing the 2nd Amendment Debate: A Perspective on Regulation

The attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump by Thomas Crooks has inevitably reignited the debate surrounding the 2nd Amendment and the ownership of AR-15 rifles. While some may argue that this incident justifies stricter regulations or even the removal of AR-15s from lawful American hands, this perspective fails to address the core issue: criminals, by definition, do not follow laws.

Increased rules and regulations tend to disproportionately impact law-abiding citizens who use firearms responsibly for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting. These individuals comply with existing laws, undergo background checks, and often invest in proper training. On the other hand, those with criminal intent are unlikely to be deterred by additional regulations. History has shown that restrictive gun laws do not prevent criminals from acquiring firearms through illegal means. Instead, they often create obstacles for responsible citizens seeking to protect themselves and their families.

Furthermore, the AR-15 is a versatile and widely-used rifle among lawful gun owners. It is favored for its adaptability, ease of use, and reliability. Banning or heavily regulating such a popular firearm would not only infringe upon the rights of millions of responsible gun owners but also fail to address the root causes of gun violence. Effective solutions should focus on enhancing enforcement of existing laws, improving mental health care, and addressing societal factors contributing to criminal behavior.

While Thomas Crooks’s actions are undeniably reprehensible, they should not justify sweeping measures that would penalize law-abiding Americans. It is crucial to distinguish between criminals’ actions and the rights of responsible citizens, ensuring that any regulatory efforts are balanced and targeted toward genuinely enhancing public safety without undermining constitutional freedoms.

Conclusion

The AR-15 build used in this attempted assassination reflects common trends in the firearms community, where cost and accessibility often dictate choices over performance and precision. Using a DPMS lower, Aero Precision upper, and budget-friendly accessories underscores a desire to assemble a functional firearm without incurring high costs.

The attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump by Thomas Crooks underscores the complex interplay between firearm accessibility, public safety, and individual rights. The use of a DPMS Panther Arms AR-15 in this incident has reignited debates on gun control, but it’s essential to approach these discussions with nuance and factual understanding. Banning AR-15s or imposing stricter regulations on law-abiding citizens does not address the root causes of such violent acts.

Instead, efforts should focus on enforcing existing laws more effectively, enhancing mental health support, and addressing socio-economic factors contributing to criminal behavior. By targeting the real issues and not infringing upon the rights of responsible gun owners, we can work towards a safer society without compromising constitutional freedoms.

As we reflect on this event, it’s crucial to remember that firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens play a vital role in personal security and preserving liberty. The path forward requires balanced, informed approaches that protect public safety while respecting individual rights.